Quality management

The Quality Management System (QMS) at HSD Hochschule Döpfer was developed with the aim of creating a system that promotes clarity and transparency, allows for meaningful discretion, ensures the necessary flexibility, identifies undesirable trends at an early stage, and takes into account the structures and specific characteristics of HSD Hochschule Döpfer, in order to provide the university with an appropriate and useful set of tools for targeted and agile development.

The guidelines and standards required for quality assurance are designed to satisfy internal and external accountability requirements whilst supporting a vibrant quality culture. They take into account legal requirements, international standards, the criteria of the Accreditation Ordinance, and the specific requirements of a higher education institution.

The QMS of HSD Hochschule Döpfer has been accredited by the Accreditation Council since 2021. System accreditation allows HSD Hochschule Döpfer to carry out the accreditation processes for its degree programmes under its own responsibility. Information on the accreditation reports for the individual degree programmes is published here.

Prof. Dr Marianne Frick has taken over the management of quality assurance


Continuous quality improvement

The structure of the quality management system is based on the concept and framework of the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle. By being designed as a regular cycle comprising the key stages of planning, implementation, review and analysis, followed by new or revised planning, it ensures the university’s targeted and evidence-based continuous quality improvement.

The quality development cycle comprises the following elements:

  • Planning (Plan): The university management sends the action and accreditation plan, as determined in the ‘Act’ step of the annual steering meeting, to the individual departments. The heads of department coordinate the steps required to implement the agreed measures within their respective departments. In the Teaching department, the Dean’s Offices plan the development measures for the individual degree programmes; in the Quality Management department, the accreditation procedures are planned.
  • Implementation (Do): All senior management roles are responsible for the efficient and effective implementation of the planned measures within their respective areas. The academic deans’ offices oversee the ongoing maintenance of quality in degree programmes and the coordination of academic operations, taking the action plan into account. Quality management supports implementation by systematising and formalising procedures through processes and forms.
  • Evaluation (Check): The success of the planned measures and the achievement of the set objectives are reviewed at the end of each academic year using key performance indicators and quality data. The evaluation tools specified in the QM Manual are used for this purpose. The results are reflected upon and analysed, taking into account student feedback, and recorded in the quality and departmental reports. The continuous review and development of the quality management system and evaluation procedures with regard to their relevance and appropriateness is carried out through an annual quality audit involving external experts and students. At university level, the impact assessment is carried out through the analysis of departmental reports, the annual quality audit and the accreditation reports, which have been published on the basis of external expert opinions and the decisions of the Senate. The review of the requirements is carried out by the external team of experts that established the requirements.
  • Action: At the annual management meeting of the university leadership, all results are evaluated and, taking the strategic objectives into account, measures for the further development of the university are drawn up, which are then incorporated back into the planning. In addition, the accreditation processes for the coming academic year are decided upon and the topic of the annual quality audit is determined. The implementation of recommendations and requirements arising from the accreditation procedures is also taken into account.

The agreed quality measures and accreditation procedures are reported in the Quality, Teaching and Research Report to the State of Brandenburg and the Accreditation Council, and published in the key points on the university’s website.


Process management

To implement these, appropriate processes are defined, continuously refined and expanded. The process map provides an overview of the university’s processes.

Core processes: study and teaching
The processes in the area of study and teaching are designed to create a range of courses that is academically sound and practice-oriented, based on statutory standards and those appropriate to higher education. Fundamental to this are the processes for developing new and existing degree programmes.

Core processes: Research
In addition to providing a high-quality curriculum, HSD Hochschule Döpfer is committed to conducting academically recognised and visible research in subject areas relevant to its degree programmes. These are specified in HSD Hochschule Döpfer’s research strategy. The integration of research and teaching is enshrined in the quality objectives for study and teaching and is underpinned by the research charter.

Core processes: Continuing education
The aim of the continuing education modules is to facilitate lifelong learning and to impart the key skills required in the respective professional practice, based on a strong link between theory and practice. Furthermore, the programmes complement the degree courses in terms of the varied educational interests of a diverse student body comprising different age groups, qualification goals and educational backgrounds.